Deal Structure and Transaction Tax: What You Keep | Main Street Alternatives

Chapter 4 of 6Deal Structure and Transaction Tax

How the Deal Is Structured, and What You Keep

Two identical headline prices can produce very different amounts of money in your account. This is the chapter where that difference gets decided.

9 min read

The short versionIf you read nothing else on this page, read these three.
  1. 1Buyer and seller want opposite structures for structural reasons, not adversarial ones — which makes the gap priceable. A seller who has quantified what an asset sale costs can ask to be paid for accepting it.
  2. 2Deferred consideration is not the same money later. An earnout is a bet on management you no longer control, and an installment note is a loan to the person now holding your collateral.
  3. 3Every term in a purchase agreement has a dollar value, and most of them are set at the letter of intent. Sellers lose money not by negotiating badly but by not knowing which clauses were the expensive ones.

Selling the assets or selling the company

The buyer wants an asset sale for the basis step-up and the liabilities left behind, you want a stock sale, and the gap between them is priceable.

Structure decides how much of the price you keep, and every piece of it is negotiated — most of it at the letter of intent. By the time the definitive agreement is marked up, the expensive decisions are already made.

The specific application belongs to your CPA and your deal attorney. What follows is the map — what to ask, and what a concession is likely to cost.

In an asset sale the buyer purchases the assets and assumes specified liabilities, leaving your entity behind as a shell holding the proceeds. In a stock sale the buyer purchases your equity and the company continues with everything in it — contracts, permits, and every liability, known and unknown.

IssueWhat the buyer gets in an asset saleWhat the seller gets in a stock sale
Tax basisStepped-up basis in the acquired assets, generating future depreciation and amortization deductions — worth real money, which is why they will pay for it.No allocation exercise. The gain is generally treated as sale of a capital asset — usually a better character of income.
LiabilitiesOnly the liabilities they agree to assume. Unknown claims generally stay behind with the seller.Liabilities transfer with the entity, so the buyer demands broader representations, a larger escrow, and longer indemnity survival.
Contracts and permitsMust be assigned, which can require third-party consent — and every consent lets a customer or landlord renegotiate.Generally continue undisturbed. Change-of-control clauses are the exception and need to be found early.
Ordinary income exposureNot their problem.Avoids depreciation recapture and other ordinary-income allocations an asset sale can produce.

Price is what resolves it. A seller accepting an asset sale is accepting a worse tax outcome and should be paid for it — the gap is quantifiable, which is why your CPA belongs in the conversation before the LOI. There are also hybrid mechanisms that let a stock purchase be treated as an asset purchase for tax purposes, so ask whether one applies.

9 min for the whole chapter · 6 sections