Chapter 1 of 6Coordinated Planning
Why Your Advisors Need to Talk to Each Other
Every advisor says holistic. This is the mechanism underneath the word — one balance sheet, a decision calendar, and someone accountable for the seams.
7 min read
The short versionIf you read nothing else on this page, read these three.
- 1The expensive mistakes in a complicated financial life are rarely bad advice. They are two pieces of good advice, given in the wrong order, by people who never spoke to each other.
- 2Coordinated planning is three artifacts, not a meeting: one balance sheet everyone works from, a calendar that puts decisions in order, and a named owner for every handoff. Missing any of them, the word is decoration.
- 3This is a process claim, not a product — there is nothing to buy, and no brochure can prove it. Ask a firm what happened on its last call with a client’s CPA, and listen for whether the answer is specific.
Why good advice still goes wrong
Each of your professionals does their own job well — none is paid to watch what happens where those jobs meet.
Every advisor says they take a holistic view. The gaps that word points at are the largest source of avoidable loss on a successful person's balance sheet, and nobody is assigned to them.
The usual arrangement is three competent professionals with non-overlapping jobs: your CPA prepares an accurate return for a year already closed, your attorney drafts documents saying what you told them, and your advisor picks investments inside the accounts they can see.
None of those jobs includes the interaction between the other two. Nobody asks your CPA what the estate plan assumes about basis, shows your attorney a capital call schedule, or tells your advisor about a conversion penciled in years earlier. Nobody is wrong and the plan still fails — a seam belongs to nobody by default.
Tax preparation is backward-looking — by the time a return is prepared, the year is closed and the moves are gone. Estate documents are written once and then sit while the balance sheet they govern changes. Investment decisions run on a market clock that matches neither. Three professionals, three clocks, no shared calendar.
Three ways this costs real money
A conversion that trips an income threshold, an exchange undone by a gift, the wrong entity on the paperwork — none of them a mistake.
A Roth conversion that trips an income threshold
Converting a traditional IRA to a Roth in a low-income year is often sound — you pay ordinary income tax now to remove future taxable distributions. But it raises your income for that year, and much of the code is keyed to income: the Medicare premium surcharge known as IRMAA (assessed on a look-back basis, so it arrives well after the income that caused it), your long-term capital gains rate, the phase-out of deductions and credits, the surtax on net investment income, and state thresholds. Without a projection, a decision meant to save across a lifetime can cost more in one year than it saves in five.
A 1031 exchange undone by a gift
A 1031 exchange defers the gain on an investment property by rolling it into a replacement — your original, low basis carries forward instead of resetting. Held until death, the deferred gain meets the basis adjustment at death and the appreciation can pass to heirs without income tax on that gain. Gift that property to your children during your life and it reverses — they generally take your carryover basis, and the deferred gain becomes theirs whenever they sell. Together the two moves cost the family real money, because the professionals behind them never spoke.
The wrong entity signs the paperwork
Alternative investments ask something public markets never do: who is the investor? A subscription agreement asks whether the subscriber is an individual, a joint account, a revocable or irrevocable trust, a single-member LLC, or a retirement account, and the answer changes eligibility, tax reporting, and sometimes availability. An irrevocable trust drafted for good estate reasons may not clear an accredited-investor test. A retirement account that invests in a fund using borrowed money can generate unrelated business taxable income, so a sheltered account files a return and pays tax. Both are cheap to avoid and expensive to fix. See fund structures for how the question gets asked.
No individual decision in those three failures was a mistake. When the loss comes from bad advice you can replace the advisor; when it comes from two pieces of good advice colliding, there is nobody to fire — which is why it goes unaddressed for years.
What real coordination has to produce
Coordination is not a standing meeting — it is one balance sheet, a calendar that puts decisions in order, and someone accountable for every handoff.
Coordination reduces to three artifacts, and a firm that cannot show you all three is using the word as decoration.
- 1
One balance sheet everyone works from
Every account, entity, property, policy, and document in one view — with what drives decisions attached: how it is titled, its basis where known, its beneficiary, what it is pledged against, and which professional touched it last. Most people have never seen theirs, and assembling it surfaces problems before any strategy gets proposed.
- 2
A decision calendar, not a task list
Some decisions have to happen in a specific order — harvest before you convert, know your projected income before you gift, settle the entity question before you subscribe. Others sit against deadlines that do not move, including the 45-day identification and 180-day closing windows in a 1031 exchange. A list of good ideas with no order attached is not a plan.
- 3
A named owner for every seam
Where two professionals’ work touches, one person is accountable for the handoff: who sends what, to whom, by when, and who confirms it landed. Firms skip this because it is unglamorous and impossible to put in a brochure. It is also where the value is.
That convening role is ours. We do not replace your CPA or your attorney; most clients keep the professionals they already trust. Somebody calls them, brings a current balance sheet, and follows up: a projection run while there is still time to act, a draft trust read against how the assets are titled, a fund commitment checked against the signing entity before the paperwork goes out.
Who is responsible for the gaps
Unless you hire someone to own the handoffs, you own them — and that fails in the year with a sale or a death in it.
You own the seams unless you hire someone to — that is the default for nearly everyone with a complicated balance sheet. It works right up until the year it matters most.
A plan is a sequence, not a document. The document is just what the sequence looks like written down.
There is nothing here to buy
Coordination is a process claim, not a product — no brochure can verify it, so ask concrete questions about handoffs and about what happens before December.
Coordination is not a fund or a structure — it is a process claim, which cannot be verified from a brochure and should not be taken on assurance. It is also the easiest claim to fake — a standing quarterly call can look exactly like coordination while producing nothing.
So test it. Ask to see the balance sheet format a firm uses on live clients. Ask when they last initiated a call with a client’s CPA and what it was about. Ask what they refuse to opine on — anyone claiming competence in tax law, estate law, and investment selection at once is telling you something about their judgment. Ask what happens before December. The answers are concrete or they are not.
This is worth your attention because compounding runs in both directions — money saved by good sequencing earns for decades, and money lost to bad sequencing is gone in a year you cannot re-do. Tax drag is the arithmetic of what leaks out; strategic planning is the same idea in specific circumstances.
Common questions
- Do I have to move my accounts to you for this to work?
- No. Most of the value comes from the sequencing and the follow-up, not from custody. We can build and maintain a plan around accounts held elsewhere, though there are practical limits — the further an asset sits from our view, the more the accuracy of the balance sheet depends on you sending us statements.
- Will you replace my CPA or attorney?
- No. The goal is to keep the professionals you already trust and give their work a shared foundation. If we think a specialist is needed for a particular question — an estate attorney rather than a generalist, for instance — we will say so and explain why, but that is a recommendation about scope, not a replacement.
- What if my CPA has no interest in being coordinated with?
- Some do not, and that is a data point about the relationship worth noticing. We can still do a great deal from the return and the balance sheet, including building a projection ourselves for the CPA to react to. The value is lower than it would be with a willing participant, and I would rather say that plainly than pretend otherwise.
- How is this different from getting a financial plan?
- A financial plan is a document produced at a moment in time. Coordination is the operating cadence that keeps the document true — the projection before year end, the review when the law or your life changes, the call that catches a conflict before it is executed. Plans go stale. Cadences do not.
7 min for the whole chapter · 5 sections
Want to know whether this applies to you?
Reading about a strategy and knowing whether it fits your situation are two different things. Tell us what you are working with and we will be straight with you about whether this is the right tool.